BMO Family Office
Conflict resolution strategies to help ensure the longevity of your business
If you run a family-owned, private or closely held business, you may find that you spend more time working in the business than working on it, specifically on ensuring its longevity. This is partly due to the dynamics inherent in family-owned businesses, where you may be required to choose between what’s optimal for your business and what’s best for your family. These emotional dynamics can devalue or even tear a business apart—preventing you from transferring it to the next generation, whether within your family or outside of it. Understanding the following five dynamics may help you avoid mixing business and family, and run your company in a way that both increases its value and ensures its longevity.
1.Financial control vs. human capital
Conflict: Because so much of your own assets and cash flow is tied to your business, it’s only natural for you to want to retain full control. However, human capital is an asset. It may seem counterintuitive but, if you allow others to rise into leadership positions—and make yourself replaceable—the value of your business will increase because its success won’t rest entirely on your shoulders. With capable, talented people in your business, it’s more likely to grow. Plus, once your business is transferable, you can start thinking about retirement.
Case study in the value of human capital
Jim was only a few years from retirement. He had built a very successful HVAC installation and servicing business. He knew every customer by name, had an annual Christmas party with his vendors, customers, and employees, and even came in on the weekends to work on scheduling and ordering parts. He knew he had a lean, mean, profitable business. He put two kids through college and belonged to the best country club in town.
When it came time to look for a buyer, Jim went to his trusted advisor. Unfortunately, the advisor said that if Jim were to exit, the business would be worth much less than Jim believed because most buyers would not be able to take over and hit the ground running. There would be significant transition time, and risk in keeping customer, vendor, and even employee relationships. Furthermore, Jim would need to stay on to assist—working to pay himself off. If Jim had allowed others to assume more responsibility within the company, if he had built human capital, his business would have been more valuable to potential buyers.
2. Legacy vs. mortality
Conflict: Most business owners understand the rationale behind exit planning but they resist it on an emotional level. It can be hard to face our own mortality. You may get so caught up in steering the ship to make sure it keeps sailing for years that you forget to plan for the inevitable. A well-thought-out plan can protect your business from floundering if the unfortunate occurs.
3. Business vs. family
Conflict: You have an allegiance to your family as well as to your business (including employees, customers, and vendors), and often those goals do not align, specifically when it comes to birthright. If your children want to take over the business in the future, it’s important to consider whether they have the necessary skills. Most business owners believe family members will assume control of their business five years from now. Yet, only about 30% of family businesses pass to the next generation and only 10% to the following generation. If you have co-owners who are not family members, they will have different opinions and goals, adding a third layer of complexity.
Family and business goals often clash. Placing your family above the business can impact competitiveness.
4. Older generation vs. younger generation
Conflict: The older generation “speaks a different language.” Senior business owners may be more conservative in order to protect the company’s financial resources. As a result, they may be slower to pursue change. On the other hand, the younger generation typically wants to force faster change, feeling they know the current pulse of the market better than their elders, who they see as behind the times.
5. Business ownership vs. wealth transfer
Conflict: Some children may be active in the business and others may not. How can you equalize the wealth you transfer to each? Should children who are not part of the business be bequeathed business ownership?
Bob, owner of an IT consulting business, had two children, Jim and Kathy. Kathy was one of Bob’s best salespeople and Bob thought she would be ideal to run the company at some point. Jim had little involvement with the business. Wanting to treat his children equally, Bob arranged to leave 50% of the business to each child when he passed. Kathy succeeded him as the leader and continued to grow the company. Jim looked forward to the quarterly distributions. Soon after, Kathy saw the need to divert some of the earnings to the future growth needs of the company (rather than pay out dividends), but Jim was unwilling. He simply did not understand the business need. Since there was no majority owner, the company began to lose sales to competitors and the distributions dwindled.
If Bob had recapitalized the business before his death (giving Kathy voting shares and Jim nonvoting shares), Kathy would have had the ability to move the business forward while Jim would have benefited from its continued growth. If they ever sold the business, both could have shared in the profit. Equal is not always fair (and fair is not always equal).
Dealing with family-owned business challenges is best handled with the advice of a seasoned advisor who collaborates with a team of relevant experts. Wealth planning, estate planning, exit planning and governance planning all come into play as you document—and over time update—your intentions and expectations. For additional information about family business dynamics, speak with your wealth professional.
Stay on top of the latest news and insights from BMO Wealth Management